Pages

Miyerkules, Pebrero 25, 2009

Mahimbing Niyang Alab

Dinig ko ang bulong ng bawat pagpatak ng ulan,
Ang sigaw ng sinag ng araw na tumatama sa lupang tigang.

Digmaan. . . Isang digmaan ng init at lamig.
Ng liwanag at dilim. . . ng lungkot at galit.
Digmaang walang kahihinatnan kundi pagtulog ng isang nilalang
sa kandungan ng isang taksil.

Iiyak. . . iiyak. . . Pipikit. . .
Makakatulog. . .Tatahimik. . .

O, Oble. . . Kawawang Oble.

Nagbago ka na nga!
Bakit ka matutulog?
Iiyak ka na lang ba at tatahimik?
Gumising ka Oble! Gumising ka!

May digmaan!
May dilim!
May galit!

Magtatago ka na lang ba dahil may digmaan?
Pipikit ka na lang ba dahil madilim?
Hahayaan mo na lang bang itago ang galit?

Oble! Oble!

Bumangon ka!
Ikaw lamang ang tanging pag-asa ng lupang tigang.

Magalit ka!
Ilabas mo ang galit na yan!
Ang galit na yan ang makapagbibigay ng liwanag
sa madilim nating daan!
Ang galit na yan ang makakapagpanalo
sa digmaang ilang siglo nang nasimulan!
Alam kong galit ka! Ipakita mong galit ka!

O, ano? Ayaw mo pa rin bang magising?
Hindi mo nga ba talaga ako naririnig?
O ayaw mo lang talaga akong pakinggan?

Di mo ba naiintindihan?
Kung wala kang gagawin, kawawa ka!
Kawawa kami! Kawawa tayo!

Huwag mong talikuran ang responsibilidad mo
Bilang Iskolar gn Bayan!
Sinugo ka upang gampanan ang nakasulat sa iyong paanan
noong ikaw ay sinilang.

“Nasaan ang kabataang mag-aalay
ng kanilang kasibulang buhay,
ng kanilang adhikain at sigasig
sa kabutihan ng bansa?

Nasaan ang siyang puspusang
magbubuhos ng dugo
upang hugasang lariat ang ating kahihiyan,
ang ating mga kalapastanganan,
ang ating kabalintuan?

Tanging yaong dalisay at walang bahid
ang karapatdapat na naging alay upang
matanggap ang kasalantaang ito.”

Winika rin ni Andres, hamon sa atin
bilang anak ng bayan, madama't gampanan natin.
“Aling pag-ibig pang hihigit kaya
sa pagkadalisay at pagkakadakila
gaya ng pag-ibig sa tinubuang lupa
Aling pag-ibig pa? Wala na nga, wala.”


Huwag nang itago pa!
Huwag lamang umimik sa isang tabi
at maghihintay ng walang kasiguraduhan.
Kumilos ka habang may magagawa ka pa!
Dahil ang labang ito ay hindi makakaya
kung iilan lamang ang nakikibaka!

Oras na Oble para bumangon muli.
Ngayon, ipakitang karapat-dapat kang tawaging iskolar ng bayan.
Ngayon, ipakitang karapat-dapat kang tawaging anak ng bayan.
Ngayon, ipakitang karapat-dapat kang tawaging pag-asa
ng ating tinubuang lupa.

Tanggapin mo ang hamon!
Huwag mong hayaang supilin ka ng iyong takot!
Dahil ang labang ito ay laban
para makamit ang hinahangad nating
tunay na kalayaan!

When Taming is Over


A century of wisdom. . .
A century of bravery. . .
A century of militancy. . .


This is UP Trademark. University of the Philippines has been tagged as the ‘university for the poor’ because it offers quality education that is accessible to the masses and to the proletarians.

Since the implementation of the STFAP (or the Socialized Tuition and Financial Assistance Program) twenty years ago, which is just a ‘defensive mechanism’ of the UP Administration to cover the issue of Tuition Fee Increase, the essence of being a state university have slowly faded and the duty of the state in providing quality and affordable education to the youth has deviated.

The main reason for the high cost of education of the university is the low budget allocation of the government to UP. It is proposing this certain amount, but what is being approved by the government is lower than the proposed one. To cover up and to compensate to this ‘budget deficit’, students pay high matriculation.



Article 2
Section17. The State shall give priority to education, science and technology, arts, culture, and sports to foster patriotism and nationalism, accelerate social progress, and promote total human liberation and development.

Article 14
Section1. The State shall protect and promote the right of all citizens to quality education at all levels, and shall take appropriate steps to make such education accessible to all.

Section4.(1) The State recognizes the complementary roles of public and private institutions in the educational system and shall exercise reasonable supervision and regulation of all educational institutions.

Section5.(5) The State shall assign the highest budgetary priority to education and ensure that teaching will attract and retain its rightful share of the best available talents through adequate remuneration and other means of job satisfaction and fulfillment.



It is ironic, indeed. It is stipulated in the Philippine Constitution that the state is responsible in providing basic services, like education, to the people, especially to the youth. Cutting the UP Budget seems to be an initiative of the government to separate itself from the institution. RA 9500 makes it more obvious. So does the Board of Regents (BOR), since the majority of the BOR are allied and are appointed by ‘your’ President GMA.

We have been created and tamed by the government for a century. We then become satisfied and dependent to it through state subsidies.

The university’s push for fiscal autonomy is a violation to what is stipulated in the constitution (well unless this is also, at the same time, their initiative for a ‘Constitutional Amendment’).

UP should not be separated from the state. This will make its legacy which lasted for more than a century already perish. If this occurs, what will happen to the youth? The cost of UP education will continue to soar higher for it to generate revenues and for the system to continue working. This high cost of education deprives youth, especially the majority who are poor, from acquiring this education that should be given by the government. Their life might end up in misery.

It is indeed a prejudice to the poor youth if the UP Administration pushes fiscal autonomy and the government, at the same time, will continue to decrease our budget and perhaps, will end up subsidizing us.

Will you let the students and the youth suffer the consequence of protecting the interest of the government? You should be ashamed to the poor, where in the midst of the economic and political turmoil are the first who are affected.

Separation is not an option. Let is collectively demand our administration, especially the BOR, to be more aggressive in demanding the government to provide us the budget we deserve. If they [UP Administration], let us take the initiatives. We will fight for our rights! We will not let the government stop in subsidizing us because in the first place, it is their duty. We will not stop the struggle for a truly democratic society to shun the epoch that the youth will be forsaken.

Sabado, Pebrero 21, 2009

Harapin ang Krisis, Kumilos Para sa Panlipunang Pagbabago

Ang bagong taon ay nangangahulugan ng pagharap ng kabataan at mamamayan sa papaigting na panlipunang krisis.

Hindi na maikaila ng rehimeng US-Gloria Macapagal Arroyo at mga lokal na kasapakat nito ang dinaranas at daranasing malalang krisis sa ekonomiya dulot ng kasalukuyang pandaigdigang resesyon. Hindi na kayang pasubalian ng anumang mga pahayag nito ang nakaambang matinding pandarahop at ipalabas na minimal lamang ang magiging epekto ng tinaguriang Great Depression II sa kabuhayan ng mga mamamayan sa buong daigdig.


Bago pa man matapos ang nakaraang taon, sinalanta na ng malawakang disempleyo ang mga manggagawa sa buong daigdig dulot ng malawakang tanggalan sa mga nabangkaroteng mga empresa at negosyo. Pinakahuling nagpahayag ng pagkabangkarote (bankruptcy) ang tatlong dambuhalang automotive companies sa US, ang Ford, Chrysler at General Motors, na magreresulta sa malawakang tanggalan sa trabaho kahit pa nagdeklara na ang gobyerno ng US ng bailout para sa mga ito. Ang General Motors, halimbawa, ay may tinatantyang magtatanggal ng 30,000-100,000 manggagawa dulot ng kanilang pagkalugi.

Sa US pa lamang, tinatayang may 4 milyong manggagawa ang mawawalan ng trabaho pagsapit ng unang kwarto ng taong ito. Hindi pa man tuwirang pumuputok ang pandaigdigang resesyon ay milyun-milyon na ang nabubuhay sa $1-$2 sa isang araw.

Sa Europian Union, tinataya ang malakihang tanggalan ng trabaho sa North Eastern England. Sa Germany, may 10-15% ang inaasahang mawawalan ng trabaho sa mga automotive companies pa lamang. Nagdeklara na rin ang General Motors at Nissan-Renault sa Spain ng malawakang tanggalan dulot na pagbagsak ng benta ng kotse sa halos 40% Oktubre pa lamang noong nakaraang taon (Agence France Presse). Sa pinakahuling balita mula sa Wall Street, tinatayang may 200,000 ang matatanggal sa trabaho sa buong mundo bago pa man matapos ang Enero 2009.

Gayundin, sunud-sunod ang pagsara maging ng mga komersyal na bilihan, kainan at serbisyo hindi lamang sa US kundi maging sa iba pang mga abanteng bansang tinamaan din ng resesyon. Hirap ang mga kumpanyang nasa linya ng consumer retail dahil patuloy na bumubulusok ang kakayahan ng mga mamamayan para bumili ng kanilang mga produkto. Bumagsak na ang share prices ng JC Penney at Nordstrom, dalawang malalaking department store sa US. Sa London, nagsara na ang ilang mga sangay ng Marks and Spencer at Bloomingdale’s. Mahigit 100 sangay na rin ng Starbucks ang nagsara sa US noong Nobyembre pa lamang (USNews.com, Nobyembre 2008)

Bagsak na rin maging ang ilang malalaking kumpanya ng electronics at teknolohiya. Ang Vodafone Group PLC, ang pinakamalaking kumpanya ng mobile cellular phone sa buong mundo, ay hindi na makaraos sa pagbagsak ng halaga ng mga stocks nito (Associate Press, Nobyembre 2008). Nagsampa na ng hiling para sa bailout ang Circuit City Stores Inc, habang ang Best Buy, isang electronics retail chain, ay nagdeklara na rin ng pagkalugi (USNews.com, Nobyembre 2008). Patuloy namang humahaba ang listahan ng mga real estate companies na nababangkarote dulot ng pagputok ng tinaguriang housing bubble/subprime mortgaging.

Kaalinsabay naman nito ang lumolobong utang ng gobyernong US at iba pang bansa, malalaking multinasyunal na kumpanya, hanggang ng mga tahanan at mamamayan dulot ng kasalukuyang pinansyal na krisis.

Kahit ang matagal nang taktika ng US na manggera para isalba ang kanyang ekonomiya ay hindi na kayang isalba ito sa krisis, bukod pa sa lalong nabubunyag ang tunay na interes ng US sa mga gerang agresyon sa Iraq at Afghanistan. Nitong huli, malawak ang pagkondena ng mamamayan sa buong daigdig sa tuwirang pagsuporta ng gobyernong US sa pambobomba ng Israel sa Gaza na patuloy na pumapatay at sumasalanta sa mga inosenteng sibilyan sa likod ng motibong makontrol ang pipelines sa Gaza. Matagal nang nalantad ang ‘gera laban sa terorismo’ ng US bilang taktika para sa makasariling interes nito.

Epekto na krisis sa malakonyal at malapyudal na Pilipinas

Samantala, anumang paliwanag ni Arroyo na hindi o minimal lang ang magiging epekto ng pandaigdigang krisis ay hindi na makakalusot sa mamamayan. Sa halip, mas magiging masahol malala, matagal at mapanalanta ang resesyon sa mga atrasado at pre-industriyal na mga malakolonya tulad ng Pilipinas.

Tumaas na naman ang presyo ng bilihin, tulad ng LPG at pagkain. Habang ayon sa huling Social Weather Station sarbey, 52% ng mamamayang Pilipino ang tinuturing ang kanilang sarili na mas mahirap pa sa daga. 23.7% (21.5 milyon katao) ng mamamayang Pilipino ang dumaranas ng iba’t ibang antas ng kagutuman. Mas malala pa rito ang 40% tantos ng kagutuman, ayon sa sarbey ng Gallup International nitong Nobyembre. Doble ito ng pandaigdigang average at naglagay sa Pilipinas bilang ikalima sa talaan ng kagutuman sa buong mundo.

Nauna na ring binaggit ng Ibon Foundation na para makaagapay sa krisis, mas maraming buwis na babayaran ang mamamayan ngayong 2009. Tunguhin, halimbawa, ng gobyernong US-Arroyo na magpataw ng mas marami at panibagong mga buwis ngayong taon ito na aabot sa P12-25 bilyon sa pamamagitan ng buwis sa tabako, alkohol (sin taxes) at maging sa ‘Internet blogging’ para lamang makapangalap ng dagdag-pondo sa gitna ng krisis.

Tuwiran rin ang magiging epekto ng resesyon sa eksport ng bansa. Pangunahin na rito ang industriyang elektroniks na nagluluwal ng 67-70% ng eksport ng Pilipinas, kalakhan sa US. Bunga ng pagdausdos ng pandaigdigang pamilihan para sa mga produkto nito, bumabagsak ito nang mahigit 30% kada buwan, at inaasahang patuloy na babagsak ngayong taon. Marami sa mga 600,000 manggagawa sa industriyang ito ay pinagtatanggal na o nanganganib na matanggal.

Gayundin ang magiging epekto sa OFW remittances. Tinatayang 30,000 migranteng Pilipino na ang nahagip ng malawakang tanggalan sa US. 500,000 migranteng Pilipino na mawawalan ng trabaho at maoobligang umuwi (Ibon Databank).

Tiyak din ang magiging epekto ng kasalukyang krisis sa kabataang Pilipino, habang patuloy namang tumataas ang halaga ng edukasyon sa bansa dulot pa rin ng mga patakarang pribatisasyon, komersyalisasyon at deregulasyon ng matrikula. Noong nakaraang taon, 378 sa mahigit 1,800 pribadong kolehiyo at unibersidad sa bansa ang nagtaas ng matrikula. Tumaas ng 9.93 porsiyento ang matrikula o P38.92 mula noong 2007 na naglagay sa national average tuition rate sa P437.10 kada yunit. Tinatayang lalong dadami pa ang mga administrasyong magpapanukalang itaas ang kanilang mga matrikula ngayong darating na Pebrero sa bisa ng muling pagpapataupad ng Commission on Higher Education (CHEd) Memorandum 13. Habang tiyak din ang patuloy na paglunsad ng mga state college and university ng tinaguriang income generating projects sa muling pagkaltas sa badyet sa sektor ng edukasyon sa inaprubahang pambansang badyet ngayong 2009. Pinakahuling dagdag-pasakit naman sa mga estudyante ang ipinataw ng CHEd na karagdagang isa pang taon sa kursong nursing na magiging epektibo sa susunod na academic year (2009-2010).

Samantala, apektado rin maging ang mga nagtatrabaho sa mga semi-processing zones at business process outsourcing (call centers). Sunud-sunod na rin ang malawakang tanggalan sa trabaho maging sa mga lokal na sangay ng mga kumpanyang multinasyunal dito sa bansa, tulad ng Intel sa Cavite at Texas Instruments sa Baguio na pawang nakararanas ngayon ng matinding pagkalugi. Tinatayang mas dadami pa ito sa mga susunod na buwan, habang walang ibang tugon ang gobyerno kundi ang mamigay ng mga panandaliang subsidyo o di kaya’y dole-outs. Lolobo ang disempleyo, laluna pagsapit ng graduation sa Marso.


Desperasyon ni Arroyo na makapanatili sa estado-poder sa gitna ng malawakang krisis

Sa gitna ng tuluyang pagkakahiwalay ni Arroyo sa mamamayan dulot ng krisis, gayon pa rin ang kanyang desperasyong makapanatili sa pwesto.

Walang kamatayang charter change


Bagamat malaon nang nailantad ang motibo ni Arroyo sa cha-cha at sa kabila ng malawak na pagtutol dito ng mamamayan, cha-cha pa rin ang pangunahing inaasahan ni Arroyo para manatili sa pwesto at maisalba ang sarili sa paniningil ng mamamayan.

Maging ang kinakaharap na pinakamatinding krisis sa ekonomiya ng mamamayan ay kinakasangkapan ni Arroyo para igiit ang cha-cha – sa pamamagitan ng pagtanggal ng mga ilang nalalabing proteksyon sa Konstitusyon para sa pambansang patrimonya at soberanya. Pangunahin dito ang pagtanggal sa probisyong naglilimita sa dayuhang pag-aari sa bansa para diumano mas makapang-akit ng dayuhang negosyo at pamumuhunan ngayong panahon ng krisis. Ani House Speaker Prospero Nograles, ito raw ang pinakamainam na paraan gayong tiyak na naghahanap ng mapaglalagakan ng kapital ang mga kumpanya sa US at iba pang mga bansa ngayong panahong ng global financial crisis.

Nitong huli, tumambad sa publiko ang pakanang pagpapatalsik kay Supreme Court Chief Justice Reynato Puno ng mga kaalyado ni Arroyo sa Kongreso. Mabilis na binatikos ito ng Oposisyon at iba pang mga sektor at grupo. Sa pakanang ito, walang ibang makikinabang kundi si Arroyo at ang panukalang cha-cha dahil si Puno na lamang ang matitirang mahistrado na hindi kontrolado ng Malakanyang sa Korte Suprema matamang magretiro ang pito sa kanila ngayong Enero. Sa kasalukuyan, 12 sa 15 na mahistrado ay appointees ni Arroyo. Ang pinakahuling mahistradong in-appoint sa Korte Suprema, si Associate Justice Diosdado Peralta, ay kilalang malapit na kaibigan ni Arroyo.

Ngayong muling magbubukas ang Kongreso, tiyak namang ipagpipilitan ni Arroyo ang paggiit sa ‘magkasanib na Constitutional Assembly (unilateral Con-Ass)’ kahit na siguradong tatanggihan ito ng Senado at idineklara na ring labag sa batas. Paborable ang isang magkasanib na Con-Ass para kay Arroyo lalo pa’t mayorya ng Kongreso ay kanyang mga kaalyado – tulad ng kung paanong nakasangkapan niya ang kanyang mga kaalyado upang ibasura ang naunang mga impeachment complaint laban sa kanya. Sa nauna nang pinagsanib na resolusyon ng lahat ng mga Senador kontra-Con-Ass, tinatayang ang Korte Suprema ang huling hantungan para maipasa ang panukalang cha-cha.

Pasismo, panunupil at panlilinlang


Dahil desperadong makapanatili sa pwesto, ginagawa ni Arroyo ang lahat ng paraan upang hatiin, hadlangan at supilin ang hanay ng mga ligal na oposisyon at kilusang masa. Tuluy-tuloy ang pagbigwas ni Arroyo ng pulitikal na panunupil at dahas, pangunahin na sa mga lider-aktibista at kasapi ng mga aktibistang organisasyon. Tampok ngayon ang ‘kriminalisasyon’ ng mga aktibista sa pamamagitan ng pagsampa ng mga kasong pulos paratang at walang batayan.

Samantala, patuloy pa rin ang extra-hudisyal na pagpatay at forced disappearances na sangkot ang hinihinalang mga elemento ng militar.

Tagos naman ang bangis ng panunupil ng estado maging sa mga kampus at eskwelahan. Ilang mga lider-estudyante ang hayagang pinararatangang mga ‘NPA recruiter at komunista’ at sukdulang sampahan ng gawa-gawang kasong rebelyon ang limang estudyante ng Polytechnic University of the Philippines (PUP) sa Lopez, Quezon.

Patuloy ang paglulunsad ng mga forum at symposium ng Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) sa pamamagitan ng ROTC (Reserved Officers Training Corps) na walang ibang layunin kundi siraan ang mga aktibista at progresibong organisasyon ng mga kabataan sa mga eskwelahan.

Panlilinlang din ang isinusulong na nag-aastang progresibong Magna Carta of Students ni Akbayan Rep. Risa Hontiveros-Baraquel sa Kongreso na naglalaman ng mga panukalang magliligalisa, reguralisa at magpapahintulot ng higit pang panunupil sa mga estudyante.

At habang papalapit ang Eleksyong 2010, ngayon pa lang, unti-unti nang kinokonsolida ni Arroyo ang kanyang makinarya para sa malawakang dayaan, panunupil at panlilinlang. Nitong huli, tampok ang isinagawang Cabinet revamp ng Malakanyang kung saan pawang mga retired general, ang ilan sa kanila’y sangkot sa kontrobersyal na Hello Garci, (Razon bilang Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process, Esperon sa Presidential Management Staff, Danga bilang AFP Chief of Staff, atbp.) ang itinalaga ni Arroyo sa mga susing pusisyon sa kanyang Gabinete, habang si Retired Gen. Jovito Palparan ay nababalitang itatalaga sa Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA)at/o Dangerous Drugs Board (DDB).

Harapin ang krisis! Kumilos para sa panlipunang pagbabago!

Napakapaborable ng kasalukuyang krisis para lalong magkaisa ang kabataan at mamamayan na kumilos para sa panlipunang pagbabago.

Hamon sa atin sa kasalukuyan na mas patiningin ang pambansa-demokratikong pagsusuri at solusyon sa harap ng malawakang kahirapan, kagutuman at lumalalang pasismo at tiraniya ng rehimen.

Kailangang maging mapagmatyag at mapagbantay sa mga kaganapan pag-usad ng mga usaping pambansa habang patuloy na inilalantad ang kabulukan ng imperyalistang sistema sampu ng pandaigdigang resesyon.

Kailangang puspusang maglunsad ng tuluy-tuloy at sustinidong malawakang kampanyang higit na maglalantad sa desperasyon ni Arroyo na makapanatili sa pwesto. Nakaamba ang kaliwa’t kanang mga pakana kabilang na ang iba’t ibang mga iskema at paraan sakaling mabigo ang cha-cha at matuloy ang halalan sa 2010. Hindi kailanman pahihintulutan ni Arroyo na mawala sa estado-poder dahil nangangahulugan ito ng kanyang pagharap at pagkakalaboso sa lahat kanyang mga krimen sa mamamayan.

Kailangang tiyakin ang pagkakawing ng mga isyung lokal at sektoral sa paniningil sa rehimeng US-Arroyo. Malakas na labanan ang mga pakana ni Arroyo para atakehin at supilin ang mga demokratikong karapatan at interes ng mamamayan.

Kailangang mag-ipon ng sapat na lakas at pwersa ang kilusang kabataan at masa upang masustini ang kampanya laban sa diktadura at panunupil ni Arroyo habang masusi at patuloy na ikinakampanya sa pinakamalawak na bilang ng masang kabataan at mamamayan ang kawastuhan ng pambansa-demokratikong pakikipaka. Magagawa lamang ito kung sasanib ang kilusang kabataan-estudyante sa hanay ng batayang masa. Ang sustinido at solidong lakas ng kabataan at mamamayan ang siyang magiging salalayan para sa inaasahang bugso ng kampanyang masa ngayong taong ito.

Tanging sa isang dumadagundong kilusang masa mapagtatagumpayan ng mamamayan ang laban para sa tunay na pagbabago, demokrasya at katarungang panlipunan.

*disregard default byline

LEAGUE OF FILIPINO STUDENTS

Biyernes, Pebrero 20, 2009

Struggling for Genuine Social Change is the Youth’s Solution to the Economic Crisis

Students led by the League of Filipino Students (LFS), in a teach-in today at the historic Plaza Miranda, challenged the Filipino students and youth to lead the struggle for “genuine social change” as the youth’s solution to the growing economic crisis.

“The Arroyo government’s sweet-talk on the stability of the economy has long been shattered. As all the countries of the world, we are likewise deep in recession, as a result of Mrs. Arroyo’s almost decade-long puppetry to the United States’ economic interests,” said Terry Ridon, spokesperson of the LFS.

“The the dim government projection of retrenchments in industry-wide in the hundreds of thousands, serve as a clear indication of the failure of government to truly implement an economic program that can properly insulate the country from economic fluctuations in the global market.,” added Ridon.

“Instead of pushing for fundamental economic reforms such as genuine land reform and embracing the concept of ‘national industrialization’, Mrs. Arroyo simply prostituted the country’s national resources and exported our human resources for short-term and artificial economic accolades, benefiting neither our people nor the economy,” he said.

“As such, the youth and our people have no other option but push and struggle for ‘genuine social change’, which is essentially a call for deep-seated economic and political reforms, such as the implementation of compulsory land acquisition in pursuit of genuine land reform, the increase of government subsidies for basic social services particularly agricultural support and infrastructure, among others,” said Ridon.

“Nonetheless, we remain unwavering in holding this government accountable for its criminal and political crimes against the people, particularly the plunder of the government purse through anomalous contracts, and the execution-style killings of almost thousands of political activists in the course of Mrs. Arroyo’s tyrannical reign. Inasmuch as we struggle for genuine social change, we are as active to continue the ‘final push’ in seeking Mrs. Arroyo’s ouster from office, especially if her lackeys in Congress decisively push term extensions through Cha-Cha in the guise of amendments of its economic provisions.”

LEAGUE OF FILIPINO STUDENTS

What the people can and must do about the financial and economic crisis

(Contribution to the Forum on the Global and Financial Crisis on 30 January 2009 at De Balie, Amsterdam)

By Prof. Jose Maria Sison
Chairperson, International Coordinating Committee
International League of Peoples’ Struggle

It is of utmost importance for the working class and the rest of the people exploited by the system of monopoly capitalism to discuss and clarify to themselves what they can and must do about the current grave financial and economic crisis. They are necessarily concerned about being ceaselessly victimized by the monopoly bourgeoisie, extending from the extraction of the surplus value in the process of production to the complexities of capital overaccumulation and abuses of finance capital.

In this connection, I wish to point out certain facts in order to show in a comprehensive and profound way how the current grave crisis has come about and how the working class and the rest of the people have been exploited and oppressed on a global scale, especially in the last three decades under the signboard of “neoliberal globalization”. Consequently, it becomes easier to discuss what the people can and must do about the crisis in terms of raising their consciousness, organizing and mobilizing themselves for making protests and demands in order to bring about the necessary social change for the better.

I. Certain Facts About the Crisis
We must counter the onesided, narrow, fragmentary and shortsighted explanations of the crisis in the US and on a global scale. These have been made by the industrial and financial magnates, their political agents, their academics and publicists in order to obfuscate the origin and development of the crisis, to continue the misrepresentation of monopoly capitalism as “free market” capitalism, to continue making the most out of the mess in the system of greed and to confound and confuse the people.

1. Whatever is the dominant policy stress of the imperialist state and the monopoly bourgeoisie, whether the policy is called Keynesian or neoliberal, it is in the very nature of monopoly capitalism to exploit and alienate the working class from what it produces, maximize the extraction of surplus value, raise the organic composition of capital and accumulate and overaccumulate both the productive and finance capital in the hands of the monopoly bourgeoisie, especially the financial oligarchy. Pressing down the wage level cuts down effective demand and results in the crisis of overproduction. Raising the organic composition of capital in order to increase productivity and competitiveness results in the tendency of the profit rate to fall. The recurrent and worsening rounds of boom and bust and recessions have been temporarily overcome by heavy doses of debt financing. The overall decline of US industrial production since the mid-1970s has been accompanied by an unprecedented financialization of he US economy. But ultimately the overaccumulation of capital (especially through the overvaluing of assets, the multiplication and spiralling of derivatives and the generation of fictitious capital through unregulated credit expansion for the purpose of monopoly control and speculation) leads to the super-large financial and economic crisis, like the Great Depression and what now portends to be the Greater Depression.

2. The so-called neoliberal or “free market” policy stress has been significantly distinct from the previous so-called Keynesian policy stress a) in unbridling and letting loose the naked self-interest or greed of the monopoly bourgeoisie as the driving force of the economy; b) in blaming as the cause of the problem of stagflation the rising wage level and social spending by the US government in the 1945-75 period, instead of the recurrent crisis of overproduction, the overaccumulation of capital and the demand-pull inflationary effect of military spending (the arms race, overseas deployment of US military forces and the wars in Korea and Indochina); c) in seeking to make more capital and profit-making opportunities available to the monopoly bourgeoisie through the denationalization of the neocolonial economies, privatization of public assets, trade and investment liberalization and deregulation or removal of restraints on abusing the working people, the environment and the financial system, and d) in accelerating the centralization and concentration of capital (especially in the form of finance capital) in the US and a few other centers of global capitalism.

3. The monopoly bourgeoisie in the US and other imperialistcountries has successfully waged a class struggle against the working class by using the imperialist state to attack the trade union and other democratic rights, to press down wages and erode hard-won social benefits, cut back on social spending and to deliver taxpayer money to the monopoly firms in the form of overpriced contracts in military production and continuous supply of fuel and other raw materials for strategic stockpiles, direct and indirect subsidies and insurance for overseas investments. At the productive base of society, the state guarantees the legal property right of the monopoly bourgeoisie in order to maintain the exploitative relations of production and provides the laws and coercive apparatuses to keep the working class under control. Even as it misrepresents itself as “free market” capitalism, monopoly capitalism has always used the state for purposes of exploitation and oppression. As the partner of private monopoly capitalism, state monopoly capitalism takes more forms than state ownership of enterprises, even as nationalization is a form that may become conspicuous in time of severe crisis.

4. In accumulating and overaccumulating capital, the US monopoly bourgeoisie has not been satisfied with the extraction of surplus value in the process of production, the privilege of tax cuts and grabbing of taxpayer money, access to the bank deposits and pension funds of the workers, expansion of credit and money supply in relation to deposits, the creation of derivatives that speculate on fluctuations in the stock, bond and currency markets and taking of superprofits on cheap commodities and debt service from the economic hinterland of the world. After inveigling millions of worker and middle class families to buy into the “hightech bubble” in 1995-2000 and making them lose their savings, the US imperialist state and the monopoly bourgeoisie drew the American households to the “housing bubble” from 2002 onwards at teaser interest rates at the beginning. This would promote an unprecedented level of consumerism based on the artificially rising housing values and further consumer credit (in addition to housing equity loans, auto loans, credit cards and so on). The “housing bubble” complemented the so-called military Keynesianism of Bush, which pumpprimed the US military-industrial complex but not the entire economy in terms of increased demand, employment and production. The new bubble was one more and a bigger device to fleece the American working class and ultimately to securitize debts, especially bad mortgages, and generate the most arcane forms of derivatives, like the collateralized debt obligations, asset-backed securities, credit default swaps and structured investment vehicles.

5. The imperialist state looks like it is violating its dogma of “free market” or “state non-intervention” in using public funds to bail out the largest private banks, investment houses, mortgage companies, insurance companies and some key productive enterprises like the Big Three of US car production. But in the first place, such a dogma is a slogan of pretence. It is completely untrue that the imperialist state is going “socialist” when it uses taxpayer money for private corporate bailouts. Forms of state monopoly capitalism should not be mistaken for socialism. In times of big crisis like the Great Depression and the current grave crisis, the monopoly bourgeoisie deliberately avails of monopoly state capitalism to bail out the distressed monopoly firms and to assist the stronger firms to absorb the failing firms. Bush, Bernanke of the Federal Reserve Board and Paulson of the US Treasury Department cooked up with their Wall Street confreres the scheme of bailing out the banks with taxpayer money to the flagrant detriment of Main Street.

6. The purpose of the scheme is simply to pump prime the assets of the big banks and other financial corporations, allow them to dump the toxic assets and hope in vain that they thaw out the credit freeze and resume lending operational capital to producer firms. But would such producer firms take further credit for production under the depressed conditions of the crisis of overproduction? The scheme is anti-worker, anti-people and anti-socialist. The imperialist state and the monopoly bourgeoisie are not as interested in bailing out the workers from mass layoffs, home foreclosures, loss of pensions and other social benefits and other disasters as bailing out first the financial and industrial giants. Obama’s so-called stimulus package of USD 850 billion can provide temporary jobs only to a small part of the rising numbers of unemployed. It is a poor afterthought in terms of tardiness and smallness in relation to the trillions of dollars already deployed for the bailout of the financial giants since 2007. It is starkly clear that the bailout funds for the Big Three is anti-worker because it is preconditioned by the reduction of wages and benefits for the workers.

7. The highest US authorities in the outgoing and incoming administrations admit that the current financial and economic crisis will not blow away in one or two years. It can last for as long as ten years or even more. The gravity of the crisis can be deduced from the enormity and significance of the debts incurred by the US government, the private corporations and the American households. All these debts are beyond the capacity of the debtors to pay back. To collect the debt payments and/or write off the debts would deflate and further depress the economy. The US national debt has soared because of budgetary and trade deficits. The budgetary deficit involves a huge amount of debt service, the tax cuts for the corporations and the wealthy and heavy military spending. The trade deficit involves the outsourcing of consumer goods and the decline of US manufacturing for export (except big industrial items and agricultural surpluses) since the 1970s. The use of US treasury bonds and taxpayer money to bail out the US financial and nonfinancial giants aggravates the crisis. Not only the financial corporations are in trouble with huge amounts of bad mortgages and other bad debts and worthless paper assets, the nonfinancial corporations are also in a big financial mess as shares of stocks and corporate bonds lose their value and the loss of effective demand and lack of sufficient fiscal stimulus stagnate and depress industrial production, the basic service sector and the real economy as a whole. The American households are losing jobs and homes by the millions and have savings of close to zero.

8. The current global financial and economic crisis has dramatically spread from the US to the rest of the world for several reasons. The US is the center of the world capitalist system. It has imposed the policy of “neoliberal globalization” on its imperialist allies and the less developed countries. It has subordinated veritably the whole world through bilateral and multilateral economic and trade relations and through its control of the Group of 8, the OECD, IMF, World Bank, WTO and other international agencies. The US is where both productive and finance capital have been most concentrated. It is the principal destination of foreign direct investments. It has been described as the engine of global economic growth and the biggest consumer market. Its currency is practically the world’s reserve currency. It has become the world’s biggest debtor, ceaselessly printing dollars and selling stocks and bonds to foreign entities. It absorbs the biggest bulk of the exports of the other imperialist countries, the so-called emerging markets and the oil-exporting and raw-material producing countries of the world. China, India and other so-called emerging markets are now in a severe crisis due to the international credit crunch and reduced US demand for their exports. The general run of third world countries which export nothing more than raw materials and some semi-manufactures are the most devastated by the drying up of international credit and by the fall in US demand for their exports.

9. In contrast to its longrunning arrogance and practice of setting the line for its allies, the US was at a loss on how to solve the global financial and economic crisis during the recent G-20 Summit. Bush prated about preserving “free market” capitalism. But the declaration of the summit encouraged all the participants to adopt whatever monetary and fiscal measures they deemed best. Discredited and with extremely limited resources, the IMF could not be referred to as a rallying point. Neither could the World Bank because no country would provide it with capital. And of course, the WTO is still bogged down in failure to resolve outstanding issues in the Doha round of talks. These are now overtaken by the current crisis. Countries that used to be lectured to by the US, like France, Russia, China, India and Brazil took their turns in lecturing to Bush. The financial and economic relations between the US and China, which are supposed to be the biggest global partners, are now increasingly unstable. The sweat shops on the eastern coast of China, owned largely by foreign investors and producing consumer goods for the US market, are closing down or reducing production and throwing out tens of millions of people out of their jobs. The US and foreign exchange holdings of China are vulnerable to capital flight and the value of US treasury bonds and corporate securities in the hands of China can evaporate as fast as the US proceeds to further enlarge its national debt and keep the interest rate at close to zero for the purpose of reviving the US credit system.

10. The broad masses of the people, especially the workers and peasants, suffer from the global financial and economic crisis in terms of reduced employment and income, the deterioration of their living conditions and intensification of exploitation and oppression. The crisis has resulted in widespread social discontent and unrest. It is generating the people’s resistance in the imperialist countries, in the so-called emerging markets and former revisionist-ruled countries and in all the third world countries. For the people’s resistance in any country to be resolute and effective in confronting imperialism and reaction and in seeking reforms and social revolution, there has to be a revolutionary party of the working class to lead both the organized and spontaneous masses. For several decades, the imperialists and their reactionary allies have launched offensives to destroy or weaken the working class parties and the progressive trade unions and other mass organizations. But now the gravity and long duration of the current financial and economic crisis opens excellent opportunities for the progressive forces and movement of people for national liberation, democracy and socialism to grow in strength and advance.

II. What People Can and Must Do
What the people can and must do about the global financial and economic crisis ranges from seeking relief, recovery and reforms within the imperialist-dominated world capitalist system to the most fundamental criticism of this system and raising the demand and undertaking the actions for revolutionary change towards socialism.
When I speak of reforms within the system, I do not mean harking back to the misappropriation of the term by the dishonest purveyors of “free market” capitalism who used it against the basic rights and interests of the working people in the industrial capitalist countries and in the less developed countries. At the moment, key bourgeois political and economic authorities are swinging back to the Keynesian general theory of equilibrium and the management of effective demand through fiscal measures.

As far as I am concerned, reforms within the framework of Marxist political economy can be undertaken to serve the immediate demands of the working people for employment, decent income, better working and living conditions and the availability of basic social services, even as the long term goal of the people’s revolutionary movement is to replace the system of monopoly capitalism with the socialist system.

To take an important phrase from the Communist Manifesto, the battle for democracy must be won whether the popular movement for socialism be in the imperialist countries or in the far less developed countries dominated by imperialism. The consciousness, organization and mobilization of the broad masses of the people must be raised to a level high enough to effect basic reforms immediately and social revolution in the long run.

In the industrial capitalist countries, the economic basis for socialism exists. But the monopoly bourgeoisie never gives up its political and economic power voluntarily. It uses its state power to impose fascist rule if the persuasive and deceptive role of the bourgeois political parties fails to mislead the people and stabilize the system. Thus, the battle for democracy must be won against the potential or actual rise of fascism and the use of imperialist war by the monopoly bourgeoisie to regiment the people. In this regard, we recall the Great Depression, the rise of fascism and World War II.

In the far less developed countries, where there are still large vestiges of feudalism, winning the battle for democracy involves not only upholding, defending and promoting the collective and individual rights of the people, especially civil and political liberties, but also addressing substantively the demand for national industrial development, the peasant clamor for land reform and engaging the peasant masses in the new democratic revolution led by the working class as the long term agent for socialist revolution and construction.

1. Information and Education Campaigns
Whatever significant degree of social change is called for in the short term or in the long run, the people must comprehend the problematic situation that they are in and the possible and necessary solutions that must be carried out with their conscious, organized and militant participation. In this regard, the working class parties and mass organizations of various exploited classes and sectors must engage in information and educational campaigns.

The current global financial and economic crisis cannot be comprehensively and profoundly understood by those who analyze it from the narrow viewpoint of those who wish to preserve the system of monopoly capitalism. They are like frogs in the well. Those who continue the Marxist and Leninist tradition of critiquing the political economy of capitalism and monopoly capitalism have a clear advantage as they have an overview of the inhuman and anti-labor character of the US and world capitalist system and the need to strive for the socialist system.

Research and analysis of the exploitative roots and development of the current global financial and economic crisis must be undertaken for the purpose of drawing up programs and declarations of political action. These must also take into account the impact and implications of the global financial and economic crisis on the global political crisis as manifested in the intensification of the major contradictions in the world.

The working class parties and mass organizations can add to their accumulated knowledge the analysis and advice of experts of political economy and international politics who truly understand the crisis comprehensively and profoundly. In this connection, there is now a rising demand for the Marxist critique of the capitalist political economy and the Leninist critique of monopoly capitalism and theory of state and revolution.

This is a time of discredit and embarrassment for those bourgeois economists who have followed the path of Milton Friedman and the Chicago School, for those neoconservatives who believed in strengthening US global hegemony by spreading the “free market” and “liberalism” with the leverage of US military superiority and for those neo-Kautskyite globalists who peddle the notion of supra-imperialism as a benign industrializing force.

The crisis has served to negate in the most telling way all the prior propaganda done by the monopoly bourgeoisie to hype the dogma of the “free market” through the dominant mass media, the schools, the think tanks, political parties and the nongovernmental organizations bound by the rule of civility in obeisance to the bourgeois state and big business. The working class party, the mass organizations and the broad masses of the people must carry out information and education campaigns as counter-offensive to the ideological, political, economic and military offensives of imperialism and reaction.

Social investigation must be undertaken among the people in order to learn from them how they are being afflicted by the crisis, what are their most pressing demands and what they are capable of doing to confront the crisis and bring their social movement forward. The social investigation can be of varying scales, from the basic level of local communities and work places to the national level. The purpose of social investigation is for the working class parties and mass organizations to learn from the people what must be done in order to arouse, organize and mobilize them.

There are various forms and ways of carrying out campaigns of information and education. These include the conferences, forums and seminars where the political activists and the experts can learn from each other and the mass meetings and rallies for expressing protest and demands and spreading wide the demand for social change and gauging at every given time how many people are being drawn to the mass movement. The working class parties and mass organizations can avail of the electronic media as a cheap and fast way of generating and accelerating the campaign of information and education.

2. Organizational Campaigns
In the industrial capitalist countries, the monopoly bourgeoisie manages to stay as the ruling class and control the state for its own purposes, whether there is a duopoly of the Republican and Democratic parties as in the presidential form of government of the United States or an oligopoly of parties as in the parliamentary forms of Europe and Japan. There are variations among the the so-called mainstream parties but they are all within the predetermined framework or confines of the monopoly capitalist state system. In the semifeudal neocolonies, the joint ruling classes of the big compradors and landlords likewise maintain a variety of political parties to conjure the illusion of democracy. These parties are required to stay within the bounds of the big comprador-landlord political system.

The ruling bourgeois class can tolerate a working class party if it does not challenge the state system of bourgeois rule and seeks reforms exclusively within the framework of bourgeois law and order. It takes every effort to induce and persuade a working class party to stay within the bounds of bourgeois rule. But it does not hesitate to use the coercive apparatuses of the state to malign and suppress the working class party when this is deemed as a threat to the system for seeking to supplant the class rule of the bourgeoisie with that of the working class in order to establish an anti-imperialist or socialist state.

At any rate, there is the need for a working class party to lead the people in seeking basic reforms within the bourgeois political system or in seeking to replace this with the socialist system. Basic social reforms as well as social revolution are not possible without the working class party that is capable of leading the organized and unorganized masses. Without such a working class party, the big bourgeoisie continues to rule society unchallenged and unhampered through the political parties which it uses for preserving the system, for intra-class and intra-systemic competition for political power among the bourgeois factions and for warding off any political party that seeks to overthrow bourgeois rule.

There must be a trustworthy working class party committed to the propagation and realization of the program of social change and capable of leading the broad masses of the people, especially the working people. Such a party is best relied upon for confronting the global financial and economic crisis and solving the problems for the benefit of the people and with their active participation. Without a working class party, the bourgeois parties would prevail over the working people who are unorganized and spontaneous or who are limited to mass organizations.

In carrying out organizational campaigns in the face of the current grave financial and economic crisis, efforts must be resolutely undertaken to build a genuine working class party that surpasses the bourgeois laborite, reformist social democratic or revisionist communist parties. Building such a working class party is quite challenging because of the long running attempts of the monopoly bourgeoisie to stigmatize as “terrorist” revolutionary forces that call for national liberation, democracy and socialism. But the current crisis conditions are favorable for building such a party.

The trade unions and other mass organizations must be built in order to uphold, defend and promote the rights and interests of the exploited classes and sectors of society. In the industrial capitalist countries, the most important of these are the mass organizations of workers, migrant workers, immigrants, the various nationalities, youth, women, the professionals and cultural workers. In the semifeudal neocolonies, the most important mass organizations are those of workers, peasants, youth, women, the intelligentsia and the minorities. These classes or sectors are adversely affected by the crisis in particular ways.

The class and sectoral mass organizations must further form multi-class and multisectoral federations and alliances in order to underscore common interests and build political unity cumulatively and progressively. The genuine working class party offers to them as guide its general line and program of action, encourages their political and organizational initiatives and thereby wins their abiding support . Mass organizations with different ideological, political and religious affinities can form formal and informal alliances to pursue common courses of action on the basis of consensus and coordination.

Within a country, mass formations can be established and developed at various levels, from the basic level through intermediate levels to the national level. These mass formations can in turn become components of similar formations at the international level. The International League of Peoples’ Struggle has been working hard to build its national chapters and its global region committees. It is a form of international alliance but is ever ready and willing to form broader alliances along the anti-imperialist and democratic line of people’s struggle.

3. Mass mobilizations
In connection with information and educational campaigns and organizational campaigns, the broad masses of the people in their millions must be mobilized to denounce the exploitative and oppressive character of the system of monopoly capitalism, now sharper and more destructive than ever before, and to demand social, economic and political changes, ranging from basic reforms to the fundamental revolutionary transformation of society.

The battle for democracy must be carried out according to the objective and subjective conditions obtaining. The legal forms of struggle must be carried out where these are possible and to whatever extent these are possible. The full spectrum of human rights, civil, political, social, economic and cultural, must be upheld, defended and advanced for the benefit of the exploited and oppressed people. The people must be able to act accordingly as the the socio-economic crisis results in political crisis and the forces and agents of monopoly capitalism malign and try to discredit democratic protest as unlawful rebellion or even as terrorism and thus justify increased political repression.

In countries where the ruling classes engage in state terrorism and/or imperialism engages in wars of aggression and military intervention, the people have the sovereign right to mobilize themselves for all forms of resistance, including revolutionary armed struggle. At the moment, legal mass movements and revolutionary armed struggles are going on and advancing in several countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America, where the people are the most oppressed and exploited. The current severity of the global financial and economic crisis, the exacerbation of exploitation and oppression, the blatant political repression or naked state terrorism and the imperialist wars of aggression impel the people to wage armed revolution.

To become most effective in making protests and demands, the mass movement for social change must be based at the level of the local communities, the factories, farms, schools and churches. It is indestructible when there are dedicated activists of the working class party and the mass organizations who are deeply rooted among the toiling masses and who arouse, organize and mobilize them at the basic level. This fact is well demonstrated in cases where the most vicious campaigns of deception cannot sway the people against the progressive mass movement as well as in cases where the counterrevolutionary state carries out a campaign of military and police suppression but fails to defeat or weaken the revolutionary mass movement of the people.

When the mass movement is well-established at the basic level, especially among the working people, then it can easily build and support the organs of leadership and organizational effectivity at various levels, up to the national level. It can mobilize significantly large and effective numbers of people at the centers of the towns, districts, provinces, regions and the capital of the country. The higher levels of leadership and organization and the lower levels can interact to drive the mass movement forward according to the general political line.

Anti-imperialist and democratic mass movements are well-rooted in many countries. These have become interconnected with their counterparts within global regions. The cohesion and coordination of the mass movements within a global region can be effected through conferences, seminars, forums, a standing regional committee and timely consultations.

The formation of global region committees and organizations does not always have to precede the formation of the international organization. An international organization can be formed by calling for the participation of people’s organizations based in various countries. The International League of Peoples’ Struggle was first established as an international organization and subsequently called on its member-organizations to form national chapters before pushing in earnest the formation of the global region committees and organizations.

At the moment, there are several international formations or combinations of people’s organizations. These can be consensus-based formal and informal alliances. They can make declarations and agreements of anti-imperialist solidarity, mutual support and cooperation. We are witness to the growing unity, cooperation and coordination of these international organizations in carrying out mass mobilizations to oppose the vile policies and acts of imperialism and reaction and call for a new and better world of greater freedom, democracy, development, social justice, healthy environment and peace.

III. Prospects
The current financial and economic crisis is far from over in the US and in the world. The bursting of the bubbles in housing, bank credit, the stock market and derivatives has not yet run its full course and continues to deflate values in trillions of dollars due to debt deleveraging in the trillions. The bubble in derivatives has been the biggest in the entire history of capitalism and is estimated to range from 500 trillion to a quadrillion dollars on a global scale.

The corporate bond bubble among the giant industrial firms is expected to burst in a big way this year. So is the bubble in US treasury bonds that has rapidly inflated due to the bank bailouts in the trillions.

The real economy is bound to be further afflicted by bankruptcies, drastic production cutbacks, decline of employment and incomes and the further loss of effective demand. The accumulation of debt financing by governments and private corporations in so many decades is cascading into and collapsing on entire economies. The Keynesian stimulus packages of the US and other governments are puny and restricted by the persistent neoliberal policy bias and the ever insistent demands of the financial and nonfinancial corporations to be the first served with the bailouts.

Let us recall that the pumppriming fiscal measures adopted by Roosevelt under the New Deal did not really solve the Great Depression and stabilize the US economy. These measures would counter now and then the depressed conditions only to be pushed back by “free market” arguments against deficit spending in a period of lower tax collection. It was largescale civil and military production related to World War II that finally stimulated the US economy.

There is good reason to be wary of Obama’s kind of top economic advisers like Volcker, Rubin and Sommers and his top appointees to the US Treasury Department (Geithner), the US Securities and Exchange Commission (Schapiro), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Gensler) and so on. These are exponents of unregulated “free market” capitalism, especially Sommers and Geithner who were instrumental in pushing the Financial Services Modernization Act and the Modernization of Commodity Futures Act during the time of Clinton in 1999. Geithner is a dyed-in-the-wool factotum of Wall Street, like his former bosses Bernanke and Paulson. It is highly probable that the glittering Obama promises of stimulating the economy the New Deal/Keynesian way would be squashed under the pressures of unwieldy bipartisanship and the persistence of the neoliberal policy bias.

The US policy makers under the Obama administration have already indicated that they will continue to chant the slogan of “free market” capitalism, retain as much as they can a high level of deregulation favoring the financial and industrial giants and carry out a number of measures to reverse the industrial decline of the US. These measures include Keynesian pumppriming (like public works, expansion of social services and green energy projects), military production and taking back some of the manufacturing of consumergoods conceded previously to US allies.

The current financial and economic crisis is grave enough to threaten and undermine the position of the US as the No. 1 economic and military power. But the decline of the US as the unquestioned No. 1 imperialist power will not occur rapidly on a straight line. The other imperialist powers have also taken a big hit as a result of hewing to the line of “neoliberal globalization”. This is well illustrated in a current cynical joke among Washington insiders, Republican and Democratic, that the financial crisis would have been far worse for the US had it not succeeded in exporting the toxic financial products to Europe, Japan and elsewhere. The US is still in a position to adopt self-serving policies to slow down its decline and further beggar its own imperialist allies and neocolonial underlings.

However, such policies will be very harmful to other countries and the people of the world and will provoke them to react and adopt their own policies. The currents of multipolarization will thus become stronger. In fact, the struggle among the imperialist powers for a redivision of the world in terms of political hegemony and economic territory (sources of cheap of raw materials and cheap labor, markets and fields of investment) will become more intense. The adverse effects of the crisis on the so-called emerging markets and the general run of raw material-exporting countries in the third world are leading to social and political turmoil.

The severity and dire implications of the global economic crisis push the imperialist powers to intensify aggression and military intervention and accelerate their preparations for war. The trend of US-instigated aggressive wars has conspicuously risen since the disintegration of the Soviet Union and global recession that hit Japan the hardest. Since its economic slowdown at the turn of the century, the US has become even more aggressive with the so-called global war on terror as a convenient pretext, to pumpprime the military industrial complex, as well as further expand an consolidate its global hegemony.

The NATO allies of the US, notably Germany and France, have been less enthusiastic in supporting US military campaigns and programs such as in Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East and in the former Soviet bloc countries. Russia is wary of the US and NATO policies and track record of expansion and aggression and have formed with China and some Central Asian states the military alliances, Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) and Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO).

No one can accurately predict how long the global financial and economic crisis will persist and how the imperialist powers can solve or aggravate it. But there is ample ground and ample time for the working class, the mass organizations and the broad masses of the people to further strengthen themselves against the onslaughts of monopoly capitalism and all reaction and carry out mass movements to make demands for basic social reforms in all countries and to wage revolutionary struggles in an ever increasing number of countries.

At any rate, the Greater Depression is still looming ahead. There will be more widespread social and political turmoil in various countries of the world. Wars of aggression and military intervention are in the horizon. The most effective counter to this is in the ceaseless consolidation and expansion of the revolutionary mass movements for national liberation, democracy and socialism.

Linggo, Pebrero 8, 2009

UP Students Uphold Student Representation

BY JEFFREY OCAMPO
Contributor Bulatlat

In a historic referendum, the students of the University of the Philippines (UP) reaffirmed the rules governing the selection of their lone representative to the highest policy-making body of the university.

An overwhelming 73 percent of those who voted in the referendum approved the existing Codified Rules for the Student Regent Selection (CRSRS).

The Republic Act 9500 or the UP Charter paved the way for the conduct of the said referendum. Enacted in April 2008, the Charter states that the Board of Regents shall include: “One Student Regent, to serve for a term of one (1) year, chosen by the students from their ranks in accordance with rules and qualifications approved in a referendum by the students.”

The referendum would either endorse or stamp out the CRSRC which has existed for the past 13 years.

Shahana Abdulwahid, the present Student Regent (SR) of the University of the Philippines (UP), formally announced the result of the five-day student referendum, Feb. 6.

Out of 47,635 students within the UP System, 26,118 voted, according to the Office of the Student Regent’s (OSR) official tally.

Airah Cadiogan, the system-wide referendum committee head said the voter turnout, which is 55 percent of the entire student population of the UP System, is quite an accomplishment. She said that for a very long time, the UP students’ voice, as made clear through their participation in electoral processes within the university, had not been as valiant as it was in the recently-concluded referendum.

For or against

In the referendum, students were to vote for or against the further implementation of the CRSRS in the nomination and selection process of the SR. Thus, the question was whether a student is in favor or against the ratification of the present selection guidelines.

The document, which was collectively penned by the members of the General Assembly of Student Councils in 1996, has been the guiding principle of the selection of the SR since then.

A “yes” vote meant that a student agreed that CRSRS should still be implemented as official guidelines to the process of the selection and should therefore be ratified. A “direct effect” of the vote, said Abdulwahid, was the immediate nomination and eventual selection of the new SR. She added that any student or student formation may then propose amendments to the provisions in the CRSRS that are deemed to be in need of changes.

Another important implication of the vote is the prevention of intervention of the university administration in the SR selection process as stated in one of its provisions.

“No” vote, on the other hand, meant opposition to the further existence of the CRSRS. The danger of the vote, noted Abdulwahid, was placing the decision on the matter of the SR selection on the hands of the university administration. The administration, then, can either decide not to grant the post or appoint one that is “pro-administration”, stressed Abdulwahid. A scenario of a Malacañang-appointed student assuming the SR post was also a possibility, related the student leader.
Further, the process by which the SR will then be selected and the body which would perform the task are unknown to the students, even to the present SR, hitherto.

Student groups who supported the “no” vote, meanwhile, wanted to include their proposed amendments regarding the selection process and the qualifications of the nominee in the new codified rules.

The result

At the onset, Adbulwahid was foreseeing a difficult circumstance in attaining the 50 percent plus one stipulation as instructed by UP Vice President for Legal Affairs Theodore Te. She even pointed out that Te did not present the basis for such requirement.

The present SR cited logistical limitations that might result from the meager P60,000 budget allocated for the referendum by the administration that was taken from its discretionary funds. She related that the sum of almost a million pesos that was used for the referendum was largely contributed by the volunteers of the student referendum from different UP units.

Abdulwahid accounted the success of the referendum to the rigorous effort exerted by the current composition of the OSR alongside other student groups, formations, councils and individual students in campaigning for the student participation in the referendum.

Largely, it was the students across UP System and their will to save the OSR that ultimately made the day, Abdulwahid said.

Seventy-three percent of the total votes cast was for the retention of the current CRSRS; 26 percent, meanwhile, voted against it.

The yes vote won in 13 units of the UP System including Los Baños, Manila, Baguio, Cebu, Mindanao, Iloilo, Miagao, Pampanga and Tacloban and in its flagship campus in Diliman. The vote also won in UP’s extension campuses in Baler, Aurora and in Palo Leyte. Majority of the Open University students also voted yes.

UP Mindanao, meanwhile, delivered the highest turnout for the “yes” vote. Out of the 86 percent of the student population or 749 students who voted, 737 voted yes.

In UP Diliman, largely populated colleges such as the College of Engineering, Education, Social Sciences and Philosophy and Science, students voted in favor of the CRSRS.

Victory

The referendum has been a success, said Abdulwahid.

She furthered that it is a victory of the students in their quest to save the institution. The existence of a student representative in the BOR, Abdulwahid stressed, is the end result of the struggle of the student for democratic representation of the student sector, which comprise the majority of the UP community.

The referendum has been a challenge “faced valiantly” by the determined students who wanted to retain student representation in the BOR, said Abdulwahid.

However, the quest of the new SR has a long way ahead.

The nomination process and the announcement of the next GASC to select the new SR will be scheduled in April. Cadiogan said that there will also be information drive among the students regarding the CRSRS.

From among those who fight for the retention of institution, there has been quite a relief from the stress and tension that mounted in the verge losing the OSR. However, steps forward must be taken by the new SR and the rest of the students amid the attack on the student’s democratic rights and their very place in the university, said Abdulwahid. (Bulatlat.com)
*disregard default byline